Legal Opinion

Cunningham's Estate

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 31, 1940No. Appeals, 207 and 208PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Linn,

These two appeals, Numbers 207 and 208, from decrees of distribution were argued together. The appeal at No. 207 was by testator’s son, Crawford B. Cunningham. After making certain disposition of property, which it is unnecessary now to mention, testator reached the residue of his personalty; this he gave to his wife and a trust company in trust, directing that it be divided into two equal parts to be “designated respectively as the vested half and the unvested half of the residue”; he directed that, on the death or remarriage of his widow, the “unvested” half…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Packer's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1914
  2. Hirsh's Trust EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. In re Pennock's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1853
  4. Cox v. RogersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1874
  5. Norris's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hull v. RolfsrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  2. Witman v. WebnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  3. Dicarlo v. LiciniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Zoller EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  5. McCready TrustSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API