Legal Opinion

Towle v. Beistle

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 1933No. 14,501PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtCurtis, J.

— This suit was instituted in the St. Joseph Superior Court to recover from the common stockholders of Acme Manufacturing Company the amounts yet due on three trade acceptances, primarily the obligations of the company, an Indiana corporation, which, at the time they were incurred was doing business in the state of Tennessee without having domesticated under the laws of that state.

The appellant’s amended complaint alleges: That the appellee stockholders, who were such when the obligations were incurred by the company resided in Indiana, the state of incorporation, where this action was…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Thomas v. MatthiessenSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Pinney v. NelsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
  3. Cunnyngham v. ShelbyTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Crouch v. GrayTennessee Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Thomas v. Wentworth Hotel Co.California Supreme Court · 1910

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karvalsky v. BeckerIndiana Supreme Court · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API