Legal Opinion

Schneider v. Piessner

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1876PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Erom the Ripley Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWorden, C. J.

This was an action by the appellees, against the appellants, to foreclose certain mortgages executed by the appellants, Schneider and wife, to Matthew, or Matthias, Gardner. Demurrer to the complaint for want of sufficient facts, overruled, and exception. Einal judgment for the plaintiffs.

Error is assigned upon the ruling on the demurrer.

The plaintiffs sued as the heirs at law of Gardner, the mortgagee. There were two paragraphs in the complaint, based upon separate mortgages. In the first it is averred that “ the plaintiffs are the children and heirs at law of Matthew Gardner, deceased, and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bearss v. MontgomeryIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Walpole's Administrator v. BishopIndiana Supreme Court · 1869
  3. Martin v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1868

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Brown v. CritchellIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  2. Humphries v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  3. Langley v. MayhewIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Williams v. RileyIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Green v. GrovesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API