Legal Opinion
Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided June 27, 2011No. 10-238PublishedCited by 95 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Roberts
Under Arizona law, candidates for state office who accept public financing can receive additional money from the State *728in direct response to the campaign activities of privately financed candidates and independent expenditure groups. Once a set spending limit is exceeded, a publicly financed candidate receives roughly one dollar for every dollar spent by an opposing privately financed candidate. The publicly financed candidate also receives roughly one dollar for every dollar spent by independent expenditure groups to support the privately financed candidate, or to oppose the publicly…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Elkins v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Citizens United v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by95 opinions
- New York State Rifle & Pistol Assn., Inc. v. BruenSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- Reed v. Town of GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 2015
- Rhonda Ezell v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Dobbs v. Jackson Women's Health OrganizationSupreme Court of the United States · 2022
- McCutcheon v. Federal Election Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
90 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.