Legal Opinion

Scott v. Hill

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided December 15, 1831PublishedCited by 2 opinions

ERROR to St. Louis Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtWash, J.

This was a suit commenced by the defendants in error, Hill & McGunnegle, by attachment against Oliver Hudson. The writ was served on William K. Rule,-of tiie firm of Scott & Rule, on the 24th day of August, in the year 1830, as garnishee. Interrogatories being filed, Rule answered for himself and Scott his partner, and staled that he ivas the acting partner of said firm; that on or before the 20th July, 1830, the said Scott & Rule purchased at auction and private sale, goods, wares and merchandize of said Hudson, to the amount of one thousand three hundred and forty dollars and thirty-nine…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marx v. HartSupreme Court of Missouri · 1902
  2. Quarles & Thompson v. PorterSupreme Court of Missouri · 1848

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API