Legal Opinion

Glass v. Hauser

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided June 15, 1902PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, rendered in the Municipal Court of the city of New York, fifth district, borough of Manhattan.

1Opinion of the CourtMacLean, J.

In this action by the plaintiff, to recover the value of goods deposited with the defendant, a warehbuseman, excuse offered for failure to return is that the goods were replevied by a marshal, but whether under valid legal process, or whether subsequently applied to the benefit of the plaintiff, does not appear; nor does the record show when the seizure was made or the plaintiff apprised. The excuse, therefore, fails. Roberts v. Stuyvesant S. D. Co., 123 N. Y. 57. But the trial justice upon seemingly insufficient evidence therefor rendered judgment in favor of the plaintiff for $263.05, the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Roberts v. Stuyvesant Safe Deposit Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1890

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Glass v. HauserAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API