Oldham v. Oldham

BY THE COURT.

“Counsel for the plaintiff in error contends (1) that the petition is not sufficient to sustain the decree of divorce and (2) that the evidence is insufficient.

The petition charges extreme cruelty in the language of the statute.. No motion was made to make the specifications more definite and certain, nor was there any demurrer or other objection made to the sufficiency of the petition. The defendant answered and went to trial upon the pleadings.

In a reviewing court thei petition should be favorably considered. After the plaintiff in error himself has joined issue upon the…