Legal Opinion

United States v. Evaristo B. Fontanilla

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 1988No. 87-1143PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant appeals his conviction on the grounds that he was not brought to trial within the time limits established by the Speedy Trial Act. He also challenges the imposition of consecutive sentences for his conviction on two counts of using a firearm during a crime of violence. We affirm.

I

On July 23, 1986, while aboard a bus on his way to work at the Pearl Harbor Naval Shipyard, appellant shot and killed Alfonso Chamizo, and shot and wounded Clarence Honda. Appellant was then shot by himself and by police who responded to the scene. Appellant was indicted on August 14, 1986 on one count for…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. United States v. Daniel Chalan, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. United States v. Brent Eugene Smith, United States of America v. Roberto Osegueya Martinez, United States of America v. Richard Leroy Popp, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  2. United States v. Louis Edward Henry, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Armando Correa-VenturaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1993
  4. United States v. LucasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
  5. United States v. Keith M. FreisingerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API