Legal Opinion

Forsey v. Hale

Utah Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1963No. 9585PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NORSETH, District Judge.

Upon re-examination of the law and the facts established in this case, and on arguments advanced on the rehearing of the matter, this court concludes that the dissenting opinion rendered in the former opinion reflects the proper conclusion to be arrived at in this case. It further appearing that no good purpose can be served in repeating here the reasons and arguments advanced — either in the main or dissenting opinions — it is therefore the decision of this court that the trial court’s judgment should be, and the same is, hereby reversed for the reasons urged in the…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ottley v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Ottley v. HillUtah Supreme Court · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API