Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Brown

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 31, 1986No. 222PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WIEAND, Judge:

Regis Brown was tried nonjury and was found guilty of driving while under the influence of alcohol in violation of 75 Pa.C.S. § 3731(a)(1). After the guilty verdict had been recorded, Brown requested orally that he be placed in the ARD program. His request was denied because it was untimely. In post-trial motions, Brown repeated his request that he be included in the ARD program and alleged that his pre-trial counsel had been ineffective for failing to file a pre-trial motion to compel the District Attorney to nominate him for the ARD program. The post-trial motions were also…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. LutzSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. State v. DalglishSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1981
  3. Commonwealth v. BrinkleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. ParkerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. AgnewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  2. Commonwealth v. PaulSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Commonwealth v. DarkowSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  5. Commonwealth v. StrangesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API