Legal Opinion
Lapiczak v. Zaist
District Court, D. Vermont
Decided March 30, 1972No. Civ. A. No. 5746PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR RELIEF UNDER RULE 60(b)
JAMES L. OAKES, Circuit Judge,
sitting by designation.
Plaintiffs have moved this court for relief from final judgment pursuant to *547Rule 60(b), Fed.R.Civ.P., on the following grounds:
1. That the order of this court dated the 10th day of March, 1971, purporting to set aside the verdict and to grant a new trial establishes the existence of good and sufficient reason to justify relief from the operation of the judgment.
2. That, through mistake, inadvertence or excusable neglect on the part of counsel for the plaintiffs, a timely…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Beatrice Silk v. Hilary SandovalCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1971
- Edward T. Hulson and Walter A. Christensen v. The Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1961
- Giordano v. McCartneyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
- Altman v. ConnallyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Lynch v. Meridian Hill Studio Apts., Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1985
- United States v. BelangerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1984
- Thomas A. Swope v. Siegel-Robert, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Murray v. Solidarity of Labor Organization International Union Benefit FundDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2001
- United States v. O'NeilCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.