Legal Opinion
In re Kerrigan
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 28, 1991PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In a proceeding to discover and direct turnover of withheld assets of an incompetent, Stuart R. Berg, the attorney for the party directed to turn over such assets, appeals from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Kassoff, J.), dated August 14, 1989, as directed him to pay $4,000 to the conservator.
*834Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
The appellant contends that submission of the order appealed from more than 60 days after the court’s decision violates 22 NYCRR 202.48 and should be deemed an abandonment of the action. 22 NYCRR 202.48…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Hickson v. GardnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
- Seeman v. SeemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
3Cited by3 opinions
- Donovan v. DiPietroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Feldstein v. New York City Department of Consumer AffairsDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1992
- Rotella v. Wegmans Food Markets, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001