Legal Opinion

Buchanan v. Cardozo

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 24, 1965PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon defendant’s appeal: Order affirmed, without costs. Upon plaintiffs’ cross appeal: Appeal dismissed for lack of finality, without costs. We agree with Special Term that there was a continuing trespass. Special Term is directed to fix the time and conditions under which defendant is to construct his wall in a safe condition and to remove the debris from plaintiffs’ property, and to assess damages and enter an appropriate judgment in accordance herewith.

Concur: Chief Judge Desmond and Judges Dye, Ftjld, Van Voorhis, Burke, Scileppi and Bergan.

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Novelty Crystal Corp. v. PSA Institutional Partners, L.P.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  2. Davidson v. ValentinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Kanayama v. Kesy, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023
  4. Kanayama v. Kesy, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023