Legal Opinion
Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. Poole Chemical Company, Inc., Defendant-Third Party v. Skinner Tank Company, Third Party Skinner Tank Company, Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 28, 2005No. 04-11217PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
419 F.3d 355
BURLINGTON NORTHERN & SANTA FE RAILWAY COMPANY, Plaintiff,
v.
POOLE CHEMICAL COMPANY, INC., Defendant-Third Party Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Skinner Tank Company; et al., Third Party Defendants,
Skinner Tank Company, Third Party Defendant-Appellee.
No. 04-11217.
United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.
July 28, 2005.
COPYRIGHT MATERIAL OMITTED Richard Clark Harrist (argued), Thornton, Summers, Biechlin, Dunham & Brown, San Antonio, TX, for Poole Chemical Co., Inc.
Richey Gene Strange (argued), Cotton, Bledsoe, Tighe & Dawson, Midland, TX, for Skinner Tank Co.
Appeal from the United States…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- American Tobacco Co. v. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Barshop v. Medina County Underground Water Conservation DistrictTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Browning Manufacturing v. Mims (In Re Coastal Plains, Inc.)Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Computer Associates International, Inc. v. Altai, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1996
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Groch v. General Motors Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 2008
- Clark County v. Sioux Equipment Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Corey Dalfrey v. Boss Hoss Cycles, IncorporCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011
- Dickson v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2010
- Clark County v. Sioux Equipment Corp.South Dakota Supreme Court · 2008