Legal Opinion

Wilkin Hale State Bank v. Tucker

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided February 16, 1925No. 9691Published

1Opinion of the CourtClaiborne, J.

The odyssey of this protracted litigation, if not edifying, is instructive. The narration of it is as follows : ,

On February 24, 1917, the defendants, A. S. Tucker and Joseph St. Mary, made three promissory notes of $500 each, dated Oklahoma City, payable on August 24, September 24, and October 24, 1917; with ten per cent per annum interest from maturity till paid, according to the laws of the State of Oklahoma, and $25 for attorney’s fees on each of said notes, all payable to the order of Pruiett, Day, and Sniggs, of Oklahoma.

The notes were endorsed “Pay to the order of Wilkins Hale State…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilkin-Hale State Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1921
  2. Gravillon v. Richard'sSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1839
  3. Succession of GainesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1894
  4. Boisse v. DicksonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1880
  5. Wilkin-Hale State Bank v. TuckerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1922

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API