Legal Opinion

In re Goel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 19, 2010Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

2Per curiam

Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court on December 3, 1990, and formerly maintained an office for the practice of law in Pittsford. By order entered September 28, 2007, respondent was.suspended for one year and until further order of this Court for misconduct that included making false statements to Surrogate’s Court and aiding her husband, a disbarred attorney, in the unauthorized practice of law (Matter of Goel, 46 AD3d 26 [2007]).

The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of misconduct, including misappropriating client…

3Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In re GoelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API