Jackson v. State

The record in this ease has been read and considered. We are of the opinion that there are no errors affecting the substantial rights of the defendant, and the judgment is. affirmed.

We note that charges D, E, and F were refused by the court “as coming after the completion of the oral charge.” Section 9509, Code 1923, provides that charges moved for by either party must be in writing and must be given or refused in the terms in which they are written; and it is the duty of the judge to write “given” or “refused,” as the case may be, on the document and sign his name thereto, which thereby…