Legal Opinion

Rich v. Central Electrotype Foundry Co.

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided January 10, 1939PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPerskie, J.

This cause is before me on the return of a rule to show cause why a jury verdict of $10,000 in favor of the infant plaintiff, and against defendants Central Electrotype Foundry Company and Walter A. Jacobs, should not be set aside and a new trial granted.

In limine, I mark the fact that I undertook the consideration and disposition of this rule, with the written consent of counsel for the respective parties, because Judge Lawrence, before whom this cause was tried, died before disposing of this rule which he had allowed.

This is a tort case. As indicated, it was tried before Judge Lawrence and…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Patterson v. SurplessSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1930
  2. Juliano v. AbelesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  3. Lanning v. Trenton & Mercer County Traction Corp.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1925
  4. Swiencicki v. WieczerzakSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1928
  5. Floersch v. DonnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1912

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Brendel v. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API