Legal Opinion

May v. Union Dime Savings Bank

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided March 15, 1935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Order and summary judgment entered thereon unanimously affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. We are of the opinion that the entry on November 6, 1914, in the pass book issued by defendant to plaintiff’s testatrix, crediting accrued interest on the account to July 1, 1914, constitutes a deposit and renders the account active and entitles plaintiff to the accrued interest sued for within the meaning of defendant’s by-laws, which provide that “ all accounts to which no deposit * * * shall have been made for twenty years in succession, shall be closed, nor shall the amount…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wharton v. Poughkeepsie Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941
  2. Wharton v. Poughkeepsie Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API