Legal Opinion

Putman v. White

Alabama Court of Appeals

Decided November 9, 1920No. 8 Div. 659PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerritt, J.

The complaint contained two counts, which- will be set out in a report of the case.

Count 1 was. not subject to the demurrers assigned thereto. Ala. G. S. R. Co. v. Johnston, 128 Ala. 283, 29 South. 771; L. & N. R. R. v. Smith, 163 Ala. 141, 50 South. 241; Ala. G. S. R. R. v. Davenport, 195 Ala. 368, 70 South. 674; Tarrance v. Chapman, 196 Ala. 88, 71 South. 707.

The averments of count 2 are not sufficient to constitute it a count in wanton negligence, and was subject to the demurrers assigned thereto. So. Ry. v. Weatherlow, 153 Ala. 171, 44 South. 1019; Ala. G. S. R. R. v. Smith, 191 Ala. 643,…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Alabama Great Southern Railroad v. JohnstonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1900
  2. Southern Railway Co. v. WeatherlowSupreme Court of Alabama · 1907
  3. McNally v. ColwellMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
  4. Louisville & Nashville R. R. v. SmithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1909
  5. Hewey v. NourseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1866

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Alabama · 1974
  2. Kingry v. McCardleSupreme Court of Alabama · 1957
  3. Cox v. HunterAlabama Court of Appeals · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API