Legal Opinion

Fritz v. Hassan

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1982No. Civ. 10082PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PEDERSON, Justice.

Fritz sought a declaration of default and proceedings to assess damages in a medical malpractice action, pursuant to Rule 55(a)(2), NDRCivP, when St. Joseph’s Hospital and Drs. Wolf, Nicely and Hanewald failed to timely respond to a summons served without a complaint, pursuant to Rule 4(c)(2), NDRCivP. (Dr. Hassan promptly gave notice of appearance, demanded and received a copy of the complaint and timely answered the complaint, and is not involved in this appeal.) When the trial court denied Fritz’s motion for a declaration of default, she appealed, claiming that the order…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Suburban Sales & Service, Inc. v. District Court of Ramsey CountyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Bender v. LiebeltNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Perdue v. ShermanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Chas. F. Ellis Agency, Inc. v. BergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. State Ex Rel. Board of EqualizationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Federal Land Bank of Saint Paul v. LillehaugenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Piccagli v. North Dakota State Health DepartmentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Gonzalez v. PeralesNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2023
  4. Bauer v. AdamNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2026
  5. Copenhaver v. GeierNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API