Legal Opinion
Caporoz v. Labor Commission
Court of Appeals of Utah
Decided August 28, 1997No. 960760-CAPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BENCH, Judge:
Petitioners challenge the Industrial Commission’s decision denying them dependent benefits and temporary total disability benefits for their deceased brother. We affirm.
BACKGROUND
The decedent was injured on May 17,1994, while working for his employer, Handyman Willie, which was uninsured. As a result of work-related injuries, decedent died on December 17,1994. Petitioners are, respectively, the sister and half-sister of decedent.
At the time of the accident, decedent lived in a rented home with petitioners. Decedent had moved in with petitioners after their rent was raised…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- State v. MenziesUtah Supreme Court · 1994
- Morton International, Inc. v. Auditing Division of the Utah State Tax CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1991
- State v. CopelandUtah Supreme Court · 1988
- King v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1993
- Wilburn v. Interstate ElectricCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ae Clevite, Inc. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2000
- Murray v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2012
- Osman Home Improvement v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1998
- Smith's Food & Drug, Inc. v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2011
- Esquivel v. Labor CommissionCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.