Kruchek v. Barnhart
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM *
William Kruchek appeals the district court’s judgment affirming the denial of his applications for Supplemental Security Income (SSI) and Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB). He contends that the finding of the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) that Krueheck was not disabled because he was capable of “mak[ing] a successful vocational adjustment to work which exists in significant numbers in the national economy” is not supported by substantial evidence or free of legal error. We reverse and remand.1
I. Legal Standard for “Disabled”
The five-stage procedure used to evaluate disability…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Smolen v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Lester v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Reddick v. ChaterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- James L. Batson, Sr. v. Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Perez v. AstrueDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2011
- (SS) Cruz v. Commissioner of Social SecurityDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Brandon C. v. Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2026
- Connelly v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2023
- Gageby v. SaulDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.