Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Iles v. Ogden

Louisiana Court of Appeal

Decided September 5, 2012No. 2011-CA-0317Published

1ConcurrenceTobias, J.

hi respectfully concur.

The law does not permit a collateral attack on a final, definitive judgment1 that is close to two-years old. We cannot order that the entirety of the contingent balance be paid to Ms. lies. And similarly, we cannot order the state’s insurer to pay the contingent balance into the Future Medical Care Fund (“FMCF”).

In lies v. Ogden, 09-0820 (LaApp. 4 Cir. 2/26/10), 37 So.3d 427, units denied, 10-0863 (La.9/3/10), 44 So.3d 694 and 10-0986 (La.9/3/10), 44 So.3d 695, we amended our original decree on rehearing to state in pertinent part as follows:

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Chamberlain v. State, Through DOTDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
  2. Duree v. Maryland Casualty CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  3. Stephens v. Natchitoches Parish School BoardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1959
  4. Kimball v. Allstate Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1998
  5. State Ex Rel. Varnado v. Louisiana Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1933

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API