Legal Opinion

Glanzman v. Finkle

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided May 20, 1957No. Civ. No. 15733PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

RAYFIEL, District Judge.

The plaintiffs, distributors of still photographs and motion pictures, who, after an administrative hearing by the Post Office Department, have been prohibited from using the mails because of the alleged violation of Section 259a of Title 39, U.S.Code, bring this action:(1) To enjoin the defendant from carrying out the order, Number 55792, issued by the Solicitor of the Post Office Department, entered December 13, 1954,, which directs the Post Office Department to return all mail addressed to plaintiffs, and mark it “unlawful”, etc., and, to enjoin the defendant from…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Summerfield v. Sunshine Book Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  2. Tourlanes Publishing Co. v. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Oakley v. SummerfieldCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. United States v. The Book BinDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API