Legal Opinion

Casper v. Bonbright

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 9, 1928PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

This appeal is from an order made on a motion to quash the process, the motion being made on a purported special appearance.

Without deciding whether or not the process was fatally defective as to any of the defendants, we must hold that the first ground of the motion to quash constituted in effect a general appearance by solicitors for the defendants, notwithstanding the attempted special appearance. This ground of the motion was in the following language:

“There is no justiciable matter authorizing the obtaining of service or other predicate laid in the facts as set forth in the bill of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Oppenheimer v. GuckenheimerSupreme Court of Florida · 1894
  2. Ray v. TriceSupreme Court of Florida · 1904
  3. Garner v. GarnerSupreme Court of Florida · 1922
  4. Smith v. BulkleySupreme Court of Florida · 1875

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Rorick v. StilwellSupreme Court of Florida · 1931
  2. City of Coral Gables v. Certain Lands Upon Which Taxes Are DelinquentSupreme Court of Florida · 1933
  3. Sternberg v. SternbergSupreme Court of Florida · 1939
  4. Newton v. Bryan, Et VirSupreme Court of Florida · 1940
  5. Cobb v. State Ex Rel. HornickelSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API