Legal Opinion

Parker v. . Eason

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 2, 1938PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

The question for decision: Is plaintiff chargeable with one-third of the indebtedness of her deceased parent, Sallie Eason Par ker, to the estate of her mother’s father, Joseph D. Eason? We think so. It is agreed between the litigants if plaintiff was chargeable with one-third of the indebtedness due by her mother to the estate of her father, Joseph D. Eason, the amount due her was $641.52, otherwise $1,381.61. In Paschal v. Paschal, 197 N. C., 40, citing authorities, it is said: “An advancement may be defined as a gift in prcesenli or provision made by a parent on behalf of a child for the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Paschal v. . PaschalSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1929
  2. Headen v. . HeadenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1850

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Harrelson v. . GoodenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Atkinson v. BennettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API