Legal Opinion

Friedman v. Harbold

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 29, 1979No. 57048Published

1Opinion of the Court

McMurray, Presiding Judge.

Defendant Friedman, an attorney and witness in his own behalf as a party defendant in a dog bite case, was adjudged in contempt for disrespectful, rude and insulting behavior in the trial after he was given a hearing at the conclusion of the dog bite case. The contumacious conduct found by the trial court arose out of a portion of the trial proceeding in which defendant Friedman was being cross examined as follows: "Q. Okay. And, it’s still your *483testimony that you are the only person here today that has spoken the complete truth, that you have heard? A. Sir, everyone…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. In re FiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  2. Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
  3. Cabot v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
  4. Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
  5. White v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API