Friedman v. Harbold
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
McMurray, Presiding Judge.
Defendant Friedman, an attorney and witness in his own behalf as a party defendant in a dog bite case, was adjudged in contempt for disrespectful, rude and insulting behavior in the trial after he was given a hearing at the conclusion of the dog bite case. The contumacious conduct found by the trial court arose out of a portion of the trial proceeding in which defendant Friedman was being cross examined as follows: "Q. Okay. And, it’s still your *483testimony that you are the only person here today that has spoken the complete truth, that you have heard? A. Sir, everyone…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- In re FiteCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Garland v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
- Cabot v. YarboroughSupreme Court of Georgia · 1859
- Townsend v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1936
- White v. State of GeorgiaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.