Legal Opinion

Federated Homes, Inc. v. Berman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 17, 1968PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment affirmed, with $26 costs and disbursements to respondents, on the opinion of Heeht, J., at Special Term. Concur—Stevens, J. P., Tilzer and McGivem, JJ.; Eager and Steuer, JJ., dissent in a dissenting memorandum by Steuer, J. Steuer, J. (dissenting). We agree with so much of the affirmance of Special Term’s determination as finds that chapter 126 of the Laws of 1962 is constitutional. As a consequence the lands of petitioner are subject to rent control unless exempt or excluded from control. There is no claim that any parcel is exempt providing the act is constitutional, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federated Homes, Inc. v. BermanNew York Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Clason Management Corp. v. Temporary State Housing Rent CommissionNew York Supreme Court · 1961

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Enki Properties, N. V. v. Loft BoardNew York Supreme Court · 1985
  2. 200-218 Soundview Realty Corp. v. SherlockCivil Court of the City of New York · 1996
  3. Park of Edgewater, Inc. v. JoyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  4. 200-218 Soundview Realty Corp. v. SherlockAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1999
  5. Hankin v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API