Legal Opinion

Colombo Enterprises, Inc. v. Fegan

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided April 26, 2001No. 78041PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rocco, Presiding Judge.

This case came to be heard upon the accelerated calendar pursuant to App.R. 11.1 and Loc.R. 11.1, the record from the lower court, the briefs and the oral arguments of counsel. The purpose of an accelerated docket is to allow an appellate court to render a brief and conclusory decision. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn. (1983), 11 Ohio App.3d 158, 11 OBR 240, 463 N.E.2d 655.

MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

This court announced its decision to dismiss the instant appeal on February 22, 2001. Both appellant and appellee have moved the court to reconsider its decision…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Crawford v. Eastland Shopping Mall Assn.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. City of Columbus v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. Cuyahoga Metropolitan Housing Authority v. JacksonOhio Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Lewallen v. Mentor Lagoons, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. Widder Widder v. KutnickOhio Court of Appeals · 1996

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. Comstock, Court of Appeals of Ohio, Eighth District, Cuyahoga County2018
  2. State ex rel. Rosolowski v. ScottOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
  3. Maynard v. BarkleyOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
  4. State ex rel. Garling v. NicastroOhio Court of Appeals · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API