Legal Opinion
Roberts v. Nickey
Montana Supreme Court
Decided March 5, 2002No. 01-176PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Regnier
¶1 On December 21,2000, John M. Nickey filed a Motion to Set Aside Judgment Under Rule 60(b)(3), M.R.Civ.P. The Thirteenth Judicial District Court, Yellowstone County, issued a Memorandum and Order denying Nickey’s motion. Nickey appeals and we reverse and remand.
¶2 The following issues are dispositive of this appeal:
¶3 1. Should we dismiss this appeal for failure to comply with Rules 4(c) and 54, M.R.App.P.?
¶4 2. Did the District Court abuse its discretion by denying Nickey’s motion pursuant to Rule 60(b)(3), M.R.Civ.P.?
BACKGROUND
¶5 The marriage between John M. Nickey and Phyllis Roberts was…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First United Methodist Church of Hyattsville v. United States Gypsum CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989
- Joyce v. GarnaasMontana Supreme Court · 1999
- Dobrocke v. City of Columbia FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2000
- In Re the Marriage of HooperMontana Supreme Court · 1991
- In the Matter of the Adoption of C.C.L.B.Montana Supreme Court · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kent v. City of Columbia FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2015
- Weinert v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2004
- Guang Xiang Liang v. LaiMontana Supreme Court · 2003
- Estate of Kenda K. Gould v. United States of America, U.S. Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2021
- Kent v. City of Columbia FallsMontana Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.