Legal Opinion

Vehicle Supply Co. v. McInturff

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 1, 1915PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from 'Chicot Circuit Court; Turner Buttery Judge; The rule of law where a chattel mortgage is acknowledged and recorded in accordance with the laws of the State where the property is located, .and is removed by the mortgagor to another State, the mortgagee may enforce his mortgage in the latter State against third parties who may have acquired rights in the property, applies only where the property was removed without, thé consent of the mortgagee. 31 Ark. 32; 73 Ark.…

Read the full summary

Appeal from 'Chicot Circuit Court; Turner Buttery Judge; The rule of law where a chattel mortgage is acknowledged and recorded in accordance with the laws of the State where the property is located, .and is removed by the mortgagor to another State, the mortgagee may enforce his mortgage in the latter State against third parties who may have acquired rights in the property, applies only where the property was removed without, thé consent of the mortgagee. 31 Ark. 32; 73 Ark. 16. There is no proof that appellee consented to the removal of the property beyond its control, or that it ever was…

1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.

On the 8th day of January, 1915, S. J. Mc-Inturff and the 'C'hicot Bank and Trust 'Go., instituted an action against the Vehicle Supply Company, a partnership composed of M. S. and C. C. Garter, doing a vehicle supply business in the city of 'Cairo, Illinois, and against the St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern By. Co., for the recovery of $1,331.26 alleged, to be the value of three car loads of .axles wrongfully delivered by the railway company to its co-defendant and converted by it to its own use. One of the partners came to Chicot county, and service was had upon him there. The defendants…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Farmers & Merchants State Bank v. SutherlinNebraska Supreme Court · 1913
  2. F. E. Creelman Lumber Co. v. LeshSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wray Bros. v. H. A. White Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API