Legal Opinion

Prahar v. Tousey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 15, 1904PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by the plaintiff, Louis B. Prahar, from a judgment of the Supreme Court, nominally in favor of the plaintiff, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of Kings on the 30th day of July, 1903, upon the verdict of a jury, and also from an order entered in said clerk’s office on the 24th day of June, 1903, denying the plaintiff’s motion for a new trial made upon the minutes.

1Opinion of the Court

Woodward, J.:

On the 11th day of December, 1900, the plaintiff as the owner of a factory building at 124 to 130 Pearl street, borough of Brooklyn, entered into a written contract with the defendant’s husband, Frank Tousey, by the provisions of which the plaintiff leased to the said Frank Tousey certain floors of the factory building, to be used as a printing office, for a period of five years from the 1st day of February, 1901. Mr. Tousey began moving his printing office in January, 1901, and was fully installed and had been operating his plant for several weeks before the close of the month…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Cotting v. Kansas City Stock Yards Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1901
  2. Franklin v. . BrownNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
  3. Daly v. . WiseNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  4. O'Brien v. CapwellNew York Supreme Court · 1870
  5. Meserole v. . HoytNew York Court of Appeals · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Howard v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Fenning v. LaskasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1920
  3. Taber v. Van PeltAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API