Legal Opinion

Highfill v. McMickle

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1872PublishedCited by 6 opinions

APPEAL from the Crawford Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtDowney, J.

This was an action by' the appellee against the appellant on a promissory note executed by the defendant to the plaintiff’s intestate. The answer, as to all of the amount of the note over and above six hundred and ninety-five dollars and eighty-three and a half cents, set up the defence of usury. The alleged illegal interest was at the rate of ten per cent, ‘on notes which had been given prior to the 9th of March, 1867, the date of the present interest law, and included in the note sued upon. An able brief is submitted by counsel for the appellants, in which we are asked to re*271view and…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Sparks v. ClapperIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Pattison v. JenkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Klingensmith v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1869

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. American Savings Life Insurance v. Financial Affairs Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
  2. Flaningham v. HogueAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Bowen v. PhillipsIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Sager v. SchnewindIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Sims v. SquiresIndiana Supreme Court · 1881

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API