Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ristine v. Haines

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided December 3, 1958No. 35633Published

1Per curiam

In view of onr conclusions, we do not deem it necessary to consider whether relator should have sought the relief which he seeks by legal proceedings other than those instituted in this court. It may be observed, however, that relator’s reluctance to rely in this action on the provisions of Sections 143.26 and 143.27 and the proviso at the end of the second paragraph of Section 5119.491, Revised Code, probably was induced by his desire to avoid the consequences of the law as announced by our decisions in State, ex rel. Harris, Chief of Police, v. Haynes, Mayor, 157 Ohio St., 214, 105 N. E.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Sidell v. ColeOhio Supreme Court · 1946
  2. State Ex Rel. Casey v. CullOhio Supreme Court · 1949

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API