Legal Opinion
In re Michael D.
New York Family Court
Decided October 4, 2010PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Carol R. Sherman, J.
On August 5, 2010, the attorney for Michael D. (child) (two years of age) moved by order to show cause to find the Administration for Children’s Services (ACS) and its contract agency, Little Flower Children and Family Services of New York (agency), in civil contempt for disobedience of lawful mandates of the court, pursuant to Judiciary Law § 753 (A) (3), which is made applicable to the Family Court pursuant to Family Court Act § 156. Counsel for the child alleged that ACS and the agency violated orders of this court issued on March 4, 2010 and May 10,…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- McCormick v. AxelrodNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- McCain v. DinkinsNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- State of NY v. Unique IdeasNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
- Rienzi v. RienziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re MurrayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Carl T. v. Yajaira A.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- In re Andrew B.New York City Family Court · 2016