Crosswell v. Connecticut Ind. Ass'n
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Benet, J., Sumter, November, 1896. Action by John Crosswell and Arthur Crosswell against the Connecticut Indemnity Association, on the following complaint: 1. That the defendant above named is a corporation duly chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, under the name of the Connecticut Indemnity Association, and at the times hereinafter mentioned was conducting its corporate business in this State by and through its officers duly authorized thereto. 2.…
Read the full summary
Before Benet, J., Sumter, November, 1896. Action by John Crosswell and Arthur Crosswell against the Connecticut Indemnity Association, on the following complaint: 1. That the defendant above named is a corporation duly chartered under the laws of the State of Connecticut, under the name of the Connecticut Indemnity Association, and at the times hereinafter mentioned was conducting its corporate business in this State by and through its officers duly authorized thereto. 2. That at the times hereinafter mentioned, the plaintiffs were, and now are, residents of the said county of Sumter, and…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Gary.
In order to understand the questions raised by the exceptions, it will be necessary to set out the complaint and the third defense in the report of the case. The case was tried before his Honor, Judge Benet, and a jury, at the November, 1896, term of the Court for Sumter County. The jury rendered a verdict in favor of the plaintiffs.
1 The defendant appealed, upon exceptions which were prepared before the charge of the presiding Judge had been corrected, and, therefore, some of the exceptions are inapplicable to the charge. The first…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Gould v. Transamerican AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1961
- Benson v. BordenCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1938
- Wright v. WagnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1943
- Gamble v. Metropolitan Life Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1913
- Plunkett v. Piedmont Mutual Ins.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1908
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.