Legal Opinion

Steburg v. Vincent Clay Products Co.

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1915PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from Webster District Court. — C. G. Lee, Judge. Action at law to recover damages for personal injury. Verdict and judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.—

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

The defendant corporation was a manufac*251turer of clay products, and plaintiff was one of its employees in that' business. In his petition, plaintiff states that, in performing services for defendant, he was required, among other things, from time to time, to clean away the dirt which accumulated upon a certain conveyor belt and pulley used in connection with the machinery in the mill. In attending to that duty in the manner in which defendant had instructed him to perform it, and without negligence on his part, he-says, his arm was caught and drawn into the pulley and he was thereby severely…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Muldowney v. Ill. Cent. Ry. Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1873
  2. Poli v. Numa Block Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1910
  3. Aga v. HarbachSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
  4. Manton v. H. L. Stevens & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1915
  5. Kimmerle v. Dubuque Altar Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1912

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Swaim v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1919
  2. Hull v. Bishop-Stoddard CafeteriaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1947
  3. Reinhold v. SpencerIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
  4. Johnson Ex Rel. Johnson v. McVickerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  5. Rauch v. Des Moines Electric Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1928

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API