Legal Opinion
Burgos v. City of New York
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 5, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal' from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Hutcherson, J.), dated January 26, 2000, which granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and denied their cross motion, inter alia, for leave to serve an amended notice of claim.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
General Municipal Law § 50-e requires that a notice of claim identify the geographical location of an accident with sufficient *445particularity to enable the municipality to investigate the matter in a…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Pollicino v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- Edgehill v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Jalloh v. New York City Transit AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
3Cited by3 opinions
- Richard v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- Henrickson v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
- Marino v. Town of Oyster BayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004