Legal Opinion

State v. Curl

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided December 5, 1978No. 7813SC352Published

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Judge.

The defendants’ first assignment of error pertains to the charge. As to possession with intent to sell, the court charged as follows:

“Members of the jury, I charge that if you find from the evidence beyond a reasonable doubt that on or about June 13, 1977, J. B. Curl and Roger Booth knowingly possessed phencyclidine and intended to sell phencyclidine it would be your duty to return a verdict of guilty of possessing phen-cyclidine with intent to sell it. However, if you do not so find, *74or if you have a reasonable doubt as to one or more of these things it would be your duty to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. TomblinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. LockamyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API