Lohman v. Poor
Montana Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark
The disposition of this case hereafter made renders it unnecessary to make more than a brief statement of the facts disclosed by the pleadings and testimony. Tracy E. Poor and Daniel H. Poor each owned a tract of land located in Toole comity. They had become indebted to divers persons and corporations, amongst them being the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, hereafter referred to as the implement company, and the Libby Lumber Company, hereafter referred to as the lumber company. Various of their creditors had *580obtained liens upon tbeir lands by mortgage or attachment. To enable them to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Barkley v. LoganMontana Supreme Court · 1875
- Bitter Root Irrigation District v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
- Plaisted v. NowlanMontana Supreme Court · 1876
- Largey v. SedmanMontana Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Seibel v. ByersMontana Supreme Court · 1959
- Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
- Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1960
- Seibel v. ByersMontana Supreme Court · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.