Legal Opinion

Lohman v. Poor

Montana Supreme Court

Decided November 1, 1923No. 5,300PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stark

The disposition of this case hereafter made renders it unnecessary to make more than a brief statement of the facts disclosed by the pleadings and testimony. Tracy E. Poor and Daniel H. Poor each owned a tract of land located in Toole comity. They had become indebted to divers persons and corporations, amongst them being the Emerson-Brantingham Implement Company, hereafter referred to as the implement company, and the Libby Lumber Company, hereafter referred to as the lumber company. Various of their creditors had *580obtained liens upon tbeir lands by mortgage or attachment. To enable them to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Barkley v. LoganMontana Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Bitter Root Irrigation District v. CooneyMontana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Plaisted v. NowlanMontana Supreme Court · 1876
  4. Largey v. SedmanMontana Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  2. Seibel v. ByersMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  3. Wills v. MorrisMontana Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Johnson v. JohnsonMontana Supreme Court · 1960
  5. Seibel v. ByersMontana Supreme Court · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API