Robert Trim v. State

DOYLE, Chief Judge.

Following a joint trial, Kelly Marlow and Robert Trim (collectively, “the appellants”) were each convicted of two felony counts of making a false statement. In separate appeals, the appellants challenge the denial of their subsequent motions for new trial. They assert identical enumerations of error: (1) the evidence was insufficient to support their convictions; (2) the rule of lenity should have been applied to their convictions; (3) the trial court erred in charging the jury; and (4) the trial judge should have recused sua sponte. We consolidate these appeals for…