Heath v. Conway
Court of Appeals of Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION of the Court, by
Judge Bibb.
— Two ob* jections are made to the proceedings in this case ; the one diat the declaration has not avered the steers and cows killed and shot by the appellant below, to have f,een Df ⅛6 proper goods and chattels of the plaintiff %. the other that the court erred in overruling the motion for anew trial. It appears that this motion was founded, 1st, on a suggestion that the jury had been guilty of misconduct in the manner of finding their ver-diet ; 2dly, that the defendant had been surprised by (⅛ introduction of material testimony, which it was impossible…
2Cited by11 opinions
- City of Columbus v. OgletreeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1897
- Miller v. St. Louis RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1878
- Pleasants v. HeardSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1855
- Commonwealth v. SkeggsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1867
- Sizemore v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1920
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.