Legal Opinion

Potter v. Howe

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 31, 1886PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtW. Alleh, J.

This is a bill in equity, filed November 3, 1881, in which the plaintiff, the owner of land bounding on a great pond, seeks to have the defendant enjoined against raising the waters of the pond above the natural high-water mark, and from drawing them off below the natural low-water mark of the pond.

The facts, so far as they are material to the decision, are these: The plaintiff owns a farm bounded about one hundred rods on a great pond, which has an area of about one hundred acres. The defendants own a strip of land about four rods wide on the pond at the only outlet of it, upon which they…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Haskell v. City of New BedfordMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Paine v. WoodsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  3. Brayton v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Watuppa Reservoir Co. v. City of Fall RiverMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1888
  2. Concord Manufacturing Co. v. RobertsonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1889
  3. Sanborn v. People's Ice Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1900
  4. Proprietors of Mills v. Braintree Water Supply Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  5. Applegate v. FranklinMissouri Court of Appeals · 1904

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API