Legal Opinion
Jerez v. Republic of Cuba
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided August 29, 2013No. Misc. No. 2009-0466PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
RICHARD W. ROBERTS, Chief Judge.
Plaintiff Nilo Jerez brought this action to enforce a default judgment against defendants the Republic of Cuba, Fidel Castro Ruz, Raul Castro Ruz, the Cuban Revolutionary Armed Forces and El Ministerio Del Interior. The motion by entities that Jerez alleged in an application for a writ of attachment are agencies and instrumentalities of the Republic of Cuba (“third party movants”) 1 to vacate the writ of attachment, Jerez’s motion for an order to show cause why the writ of attachment should not be issued against the third party movants, and…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Argentine Republic v. Amerada Hess Shipping Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Durfee v. DukeSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Baldwin v. Iowa State Traveling Men's Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Nilo Jerez v. Republic of CubaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2014
- United States v. Sum of $70,990,605District Court, District of Columbia · 2015