Legal Opinion
United States v. Scott C. Ciak
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided December 4, 1996No. 338, Docket 96-1217PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JOSÉ A. CABRANES, Circuit Judge:
In an earlier action before this Court regarding the same set of events, we granted the defendant, Scott C. Ciak’s, petition for habeas corpus and vacated his conviction for possession of a firearm as a convicted felon in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1), finding that he had received constitutionally deficient representation at trial. Ciak v. United States, 59 F.3d 296 (2d Cir.1995) (Ciak I). Following a second jury trial in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (Alfred V. Covello, Judge), the defendant was again convicted on this…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ohio v. RobertsSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Pointer v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Mancusi v. StubbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- United States v. YousefCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
- United States v. SalamehCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1998
- Leavitt v. AraveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.