Commonwealth v. Ripley
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Concurrence
CONCURRING OPINION BY
GRACI, J.:
¶ 1 I agree with the majority that the trial court erred in concluding that the Commonwealth had failed to make out a prima facie case against the Appellees and join the opinion to the extent that it reverses the order granting the motion to quash the informations filed against them. I am unable, however, to join the majority’s discussion of the first issue raised by the Commonwealth as Appellant since I believe that the Commonwealth waived that issue by failing to include it in its statement of matters complained of on appeal pursuant to Rule 1925(b) of the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Commonwealth v. LordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
- Commonwealth v. BetheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- Commonwealth v. HessSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Commonwealth v. MorrisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- Riedel v. HUMAN REL. COM'N OF READINGSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.