Legal Opinion

United States v. Kareem Brown

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided May 22, 2006No. 05-1723PublishedCited by 143 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

AMBRO, Circuit Judge.

Kareem Brown appeals the denial by the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania of his motion to suppress evidence. Brown argues that he was improperly stopped and searched, and thus the incriminating evidence uncovered by that search was not properly admitted at his trial. We agree, and accordingly reverse the District Court’s denial of Brown’s motion to suppress and vacate his conviction. 1

I. Factual Background

Our facts are taken from the suppression hearing held by the District Court. On the evening of June 1, 2003,…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. United States v. CortezSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by143 opinions

  1. Cheryl James v. Wilkes Barre CityCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012
  2. Mark Atkinson v. City of Mountain ViewCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
  3. Trafton v. City of WoodburyDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
  4. United States v. DupreeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. Fausto LopezCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2018

138 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API