Legal Opinion

French v. Mulholland

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided March 31, 1922No. 40PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Muskegon; Vanderwerp (John), J. Bill by Hart P. French against Arthur J. Mulholland for an accounting. From a decree dismissing the bill, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWiest, J.

French and Mulholland, as copartners, were engaged in conducting an amusement park, and desiring to sever the relation by one purchasing the interest of the other, a give or take proposition was made by Mr. Mulholland and accepted by Mr. French.

Mr. French paid the agreed price and claimed he later discovered that Mr. Mulholland, while manager, had not accounted for all the profits, and filed the bill herein to have an accounting relative to specified items he claims were received and retained by defendant and for a money decree for such amount as might be found due him. It is alleged in the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Crockett v. BurlesonWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Farnsworth v. WhitneySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1883
  3. Daniel v. GillespieWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1909

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Johnstone v. MorrisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Wright v. LakeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929
  3. Genito v. RabinowitzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1966
  4. Hagen v. GalleranoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Heidelmeyer v. Village of OakwoodMichigan Supreme Court · 1923

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API