In re Parks
Michigan Supreme Court
Habeas corpus proceeding. Petitioner applied for bis release from State prison because the record of his sentence showed that he had been sentenced for a different offense than that for which he had been tried and convicted. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
The petitioner, -who is confined in the State prison at Jackson, makes application in his own behalf for the writ of habeas corpus, alleging that his detention in such prison is unlawful.
He shows that June 6, 1887, an information was filed in the circuit court for the county of Montcalm, charging him in substance with having aided and assisted upon September 35, 1886, one Daniel Lonay, a prisoner lawfully confined in the county jail of said county of Montcalm, to escape from said jail, by then and there taking and removing the burrs from the screws on the window of said jail, with intent then…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Pueblo v. Rodríguez Vega (a) CartuchoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1934
- In re JordanMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- In re KimHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
- Pueblo v. Leandry AlomarSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- Compton v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.